Li-ion safety
- Highest heat production and physical response is not correlated
- Safety assessment based purely on heat evolution and cathodechemistry can give false safeties.
- Safety is best assessed by a combination of mechanical stress, amount of electrical energy (energydensity, size and charge level) and chemical composition (How much heat can be generated)
- Measurements show that cathode and anode materials are most chemically unstable when the cell is at 100% SOC (p12)(
- Heatup initializing temperature usually occurs from SEI-reactions at the anode. (Usually between 75-124)\(^\circ\)C.
- Thermal runaway usually comes from cathodereactions and start between 140-240\(^\circ\)C.
- Thermal response to degradation mechanisms (NMC+LMO 1:1 tandem 18650 cell, Fleischhammer et al.):
- Calendar aging: minimal change
- High C-rate cycling: 8% lower heatup initialization temp
- Low temp (-10\(^\circ\)C): 31/54\(^\circ\)C init temp in stead of 90/105\(^\circ\)C + more heat evolution in total.
Source: M.Sc. degree of Torleif Lian (FFI)
ARC VS DSC
DSC: Differential scanning calorimetry.
- Two small containers, one with sample, one empty
- Heated in a chamber (5\(^\circ\)C/min), if edo or exothermic reactions happen in the sample, there will be a heat flux difference from the reference container.
- Bad:
- Not suitable for large samples, like a battery
- Simultaneous pressure measurements not possible
- less sensitive then ARC
- Gives higher onset temps.
ARC:
- bad:
- affected by sample/container weight ratio, which can comprise sensitivity